[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

On 2 dec 2009, at 09:09, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:

> * Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> If we have separate space for /24 allocation policy then at least I  
>> can
>> filter the de-aggregation and stop some of the madness.
>
> Use the 2002::/16 space for 6to4 unicast routing. You do not need  
> special
> software (works out of the box), you do not need special  
> allocations, you
> only have to ask for route objects. If you do not accept those  
> routes, the
> system still works.
>
> And if 6to4 get's depreceated sometimes, all those more specific  
> routes,
> setup etc. will vanish altogether by dropping 2002::/16 ge 16 routes.

If 6to4 would be the solution we don't need 6rd at all, there are  
already modems which implement 6to4, even more as there are which  
support 6rd. Based on last weeks discussion I don't think 6to4 is  
considered a solution at large.

MarcoH