[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:

> * Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> If we have separate space for /24 allocation policy then at least I can
>> filter the de-aggregation and stop some of the madness.
>
> Use the 2002::/16 space for 6to4 unicast routing. You do not need special
> software (works out of the box), you do not need special allocations, you
> only have to ask for route objects. If you do not accept those routes, the
> system still works.
>
> And if 6to4 get's depreceated sometimes, all those more specific routes,
> setup etc. will vanish altogether by dropping 2002::/16 ge 16 routes.

No no no no. I do NOT want to duplicate the IPv4 table into IPv6 by doing 
that. I'd rather have a single /24 route per ASN for 6RD than multiple 
routes per ASN into 2002::/16.

Also, the problem 6RD tries to solve won't be solved if I filter to only 
2002::/16 and don't accept more specifics.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se