[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

Lutz,

Discussing pros and cons of two different drafts on the mailing list
is a good thing, bashing other drafts in your own, is not. What is a
waste of address space in your point of view is a legitimate method
for others. Nothing personal about this or anything I commented on
your draft.


Florian

Am 1. Dezember 2009 15:58 schrieb Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz at iks-jena.de>:
> * Florian Frotzler wrote:
>> That's really funny, you explicitly mention "waste of address space"
>> in your draft, trying to bash on the 6RD draft. You propagate waste of
>> router memory and all the other funny stuff caused by large routing
>> tables, which is really much better than handing out more bits to the
>> LIRs.
>
> Going personal in the discussion is not a recommended rethorical method.
>
> With an anycast fallback an router operator can safely remove more specific
> routing entries which are too far away. The problem is to fix the broken
> routers, not to throw away a whole /16.
>
>