This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Dec 1 13:45:48 CET 2009
On 1 Dec 2009, at 10:42, <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote: > If an ISP assigns their customers /60 blocks then they are at risk > that some of those customers could sue them under the competition > laws because the /60 > becomes an artificial barrier to changing ISPs. LOL. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]