[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

I agree with Marco here.
The policy (RIPE-481) states:

5.4.1. Assignment address space size
End Users are assigned an End Site assignment from their LIR or ISP. The
size of the assignment is a local decision for the LIR or ISP to make,
using a minimum value of a /64 (only one subnet is anticipated for the
End Site).


With kind regards,


ir. A.W. Hettema
IP-Office KPN Internet
+31(0)70 45 13398
ip-office at kpn.com


-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Marco Hogewoning
Sent: maandag 30 november 2009 22:21
To: michael.dillon at bt.com
Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

> That's not the point. A /60 assignment is wrong. If software
> developers and equipment vendors get the idea that /60 is
> normal, then they will embed that assumption in their products
> and it will make the transition from 6RD to native v6 more
> difficult.

You keep repeating this but which document or standard says /60 is  
wrong ?

> There is no need to make customer assignments smaller
> than /56.


But why ? I can imagine /60 is enough for Joe the plumber even if  
sensor networks would take off...

MarcoH