This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Tue Aug 25 16:37:05 CEST 2009
> (2) changing run-rates will render your approach useless. And > it is very likely, that run-rates will change at the end of > life cycle. That is why I would like to see a decision based on run-rates in the future, when those run-rates are known to everyone. In the meantime RIPE can regularly publish run-rates so that when the final /8 comes to RIPE, we have a standard of comparison. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]