This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Wed Apr 22 11:02:19 CEST 2009
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> Should critical DNS infrastructure include DLV zones for public use? > > > > $diety NO. > > Why not? How it is different from ENUM? > > -- > Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> DLV - as practiced by many - is a specific service offering by one vendor. ENUM on the other hand is a broadly defined/used service by many parties. I refer to Jim Reids posting for more reasons why DLV-specific policies by an RIR are short-sighted at best. --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]