[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

Hi Gert,

[...]

> 
> 
> Please read up on how HD ratio works.  The whole point about HD ratio is
> to handle the additional waste caused exactly due to *hierarchy* in
> addressing.
> 
  Sorry, I have stopped reading Appendix A Of the
  http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-450.html when I saw it referring
  to HD-Ratio equal to 0.94. 	There is another paragraph that says
  that it is equal to 0.8

[...]

> 
> I don't understand what you are trying to tell us.  There is no HD-ratio
> in IPv4.  There is HD-ratio in IPv6 (and whether it works or not remains
> to be seen, as I don't know any ISP that has filled up his IPv6 
> allocation and has come back to the RIPE NCC for more space).
> 
  My point was that it is doubtfull that we will ever see an LIR reaching
  HD-Ratio.


  Regards,

  Jurek

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: /tmp/AAAa18807
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090418/d47e78b7/attachment.sig>