[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

>   The problem with /32 is that it is too big and 99% of LIR's will never
>   approach to HD-Ratio. So in the future IPv6 table you will have
>   a few thousand of PA prefixes and possible ten's of thousand PI prefixes.
>   Certainly we can spare a few hundred additional PA prefixes for 
>   the new policy.

If a /32 is 'too big,' then I am yet to be convinced that more of them
in the routing table is the answer as opposed to /33s, /34s, /35s or
/36s.  Maybe I'm just not 'thinking IPv6.'

Filtering guidelines change.  Just because a /32 is what people filter
on at the moment, it doesn't mean that is the way it should remain.

Rob

-- 
JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited
by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose
Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Science
and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG