[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

On 16 apr 2009, at 16:23, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
>> On 16 apr 2009, at 10:11, Jerzy Pawlus wrote:
>>> I think we can modify your idea slightly. Let's assign
>>> 10 'scoring units' for a second and subsequent /32 not fulfilling
>>> HD-Ratio.
>>> It will effectively move an LIR to a higher billing category.
>>
>> Let's not do that, as it would simply reduce the whole policy to you
>> get as much addresses as you can afford instead of you get the
>> addresses you need. Skipping HD-ratio in favor of scoring units is
>> bad, very bad.
>
> Which is what we have right now. Setup new (another) LIR (money). Get
> allocation.  Merge LIRs (or not). Which is: "you get as much address  
> as
> you can afford".

In which case HD-ratio will apply, or at least I assume RIPE-301, 2.6  
would equally apply to IPv6 as it does to IPv4.

Groet,

MarcoH
(trimmed the CC a bit to avoid duplicates)