This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Apr 15 20:26:32 CEST 2009
On 15/04/2009 17:57, Peter Koch wrote: > A special action seems cleaner to me than some random PI assignment, but > this is why I'd like to ask the WG for feedback. Also, if anyone is > aware of other address space similar to 192.0.2/24, I'd appreciate a pointer. Isn't this sort of thing more the area of the IETF? I'm not sure if it's really the responsibility of a regional IR to assign space for this sort of thing, in much the same way that I am sure that it's more appropriate to have this sort of thing encoded in an RFC. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]