[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 04:43:04PM +0200, Jerzy Pawlus wrote:
> > So I think this discussion should move towards:
> > 
> >  - find examples of networks that have problems with the current policy,
> >    and try to figure out common criteria
> 
>    Can anybody (maybe from a RIPE staff) give a number of LIR's with
>    more than one AS assigned? This can give us a rough estimate.

Not for the paragraph you quoted.  Currently, AS numbers are used with
PA blocks, PI space, sub-allocations of PA blocks, etc.

I was asking specifically for real-world examples of networks that cannot
operate with "a single PA block (plus a number of PI blocks for customers)
per LIR".

IPv6 PI does not exist today, but is likely going to exist in a few months
(the IPv6 PI proposal passed last call and is currently in WG chairs last
call).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  128645

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090415/4688ca52/attachment.sig>