This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jerzy Pawlus
Jerzy.Pawlus at cyf-kr.edu.pl
Wed Apr 15 16:47:32 CEST 2009
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:51:41PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > > - the current policy doesn't permit a single LIR to receive multiple > > allocations (warning: an allocation can be bigger than a /32, so this > > needs to be taken into account in the wording) > > I think this would be most easily solved by removing the condition that > each /32 must be announced as such. In my opinion an "address allocation/ > assignment" policy is not supposed to make routing decisions anyway. > This is acceptable solution, however it leaves more space to "uncontrolable deaggregation". The net result will be more inconsistent filters. Jurek
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]