[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)

* Piotr Strzyzewski:

> We could add those two things together and make that like: /32 for every
> AS owned by LIR (in simplification).

This is more IETF material, IMHO.  There could be a magic /5 which
contains a /32 for every 27-bit AS number, and a magic /16 with a /48
for every 32 bit AS number.  RIRs are only needed to handle the
reverse delegation.

In any case, to me it looks like multiple requests for /32s are needed
only to work around route filters.  If this is really the case, those
filters have to go.

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer at bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99