This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Apr 8 16:37:41 CEST 2009
On 07.04 11:11, Leo Vegoda wrote: > Hi, > > Can the authors please explain how this proposal would work with the current > policy, which sets the minimum allocation at /21? > > For instance, on 2 January 2011, how much address space should be allocated > to a network which needs a /21 for the next year? If the minimum allocation > needs to change along with the allocation and assignment periods then that > should probably be documented in the proposal. > > Thanks, > > Leo I do not think a change is necessary here to address the objective of the proposal.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]