This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Apr 8 01:56:49 CEST 2009
> But to be serious for a minute: if all those /27 would be announced a > IPv4 full table would nearly triple in size this policy is analogous to one in apnic, except apnic's says "the then current minimum allocation." and we expect that, some day, it will be sub-/24. remember the goal, multi-homed sites using nat64 etc. so the size of the routing table will be propotional to multi-homing, a fact of life that this proposal will not significantly change. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]