This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Apr 7 23:59:42 CEST 2009
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Max Tulyev wrote: > I hear from Juniper they was capable of 5M routes an year ago. Yes, 5M routes in RIB, not in FIB. State of the art platforms today do 1-2M FIB entries. > I think, 2020 year hardware should be capable about 500M prefixes easy. Why do you think so? If we increased ten times in the last ten years, why would we increase hundreds of times the next ten years? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]