This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Apr 7 14:19:53 CEST 2009
On 07.04 14:16, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > On 7 apr 2009, at 14:10, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > >On 07.04 13:14, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > >>Hi all, > >> > >>This seems indeed fair and I therefor support this proposal. I have > >>one question though, are there similair proposals out there in other > >>regions ? > > > >Not yet, although I have seen some discussion in the same general > >direction. Of course it would not be ideal if only one region > >eventually did this. But this cannot be a reason to do nothing. If > >it > >turns out that at one point in the future we have too widely varying > >policies in effect across the regions, we have to review the situation > >and then again make the trade-off between different kinds of fairness. > > > Agreed, we can't sit on our hands and wait. At the same time if the > other 4 regions take a different approach this might encourage people > to go shopping between RIR's. Yep. And we have to deal with that then. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]