This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Apr 7 14:19:25 CEST 2009
On 07.04 14:02, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > ... > > In ARIN, there is a proposal called "Depleted IPv4 reserves". > It is proposing to set a limit to be applied to all IPv4 address > requests when ARIN's reserve of unallocated IPv4 address space drops > below an equivalent of /9. By then, the address space that an > organisation can receive will be limited to a single /20 within a six > month period. > > This is currently under discussion and you can find further details at: > > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2009_2.html While similar this appears to be a transition/new entrant reservation. It is orthogonal to "Run Out Fairly". > -o- > > In APNIC, they have discussed two proposals in their last meeting back > in February. One of them was to change the timeframe APNIC uses to > make IPv4 allocations to meet LIRs' needs from twelve months to six > months. The other was to set a maximum APNIC allocation size, by > gradually decrease the maximum allocation size based on the remaining > number of /8s in the IANA free pool. > > Both of these proposals were abandoned after APNIC 27, following a > lack of community support. > You can still find their details at: > > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-063-v002.html > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-070-v001.html These were the discussions I referred to. Note that one of the auhors of "Run Out Fairly" plays some role in the APNIC policy sig. ... > -o- > > LACNIC has reached consensus back in 2008 on a proposal called > "Special IPv4 Allocations/Assignments Reserved for New Members". > Accordingly when IANA's pool of IPv4 addresses is exhausted and LACNIC > has a /12 left in their pool, only new members will receive address > space from LACNIC. This space will be a /24 as the minimum and a /22 > as the maximum. They have further detailed criteria and you can see > them at: > > http://lacnic.net/documentos/politicas/LAC-2008-04-propuesta-en.pdf Again more of a transition/new entrant reservation.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]