This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Tue Apr 7 14:38:16 CEST 2009
Marcus Stoegbauer wrote: > But to be serious for a minute: if all those /27 would be announced a > IPv4 full table would nearly triple in size (or in other words: all > those /27 are twice the size of a full IPv4 table today). This can't > possibly end well, so I'm not in favor for this proposal in its current > form. When the price for IPv4 will be much higher, we will see even a lot of /32 in the table ;) Seriously, in that time hardware will become capable of carrying that easy. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]