This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-09 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Cooperative distribution of the end of the IPv4 free pool)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernhard Schmidt
berni at birkenwald.de
Wed Sep 17 04:34:06 CEST 2008
Hi, > I've seen some mention of a "routing slot tax", I think this idea needs to be > stepped on. Hard. Now. Besides, whom goes that "tax" to? $VENDOR? After all, > everyone with PI space (multihoming assumed) has to carry full tables too, no? No. Bernhard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-09 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Cooperative distribution of the end of the IPv4 free pool)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]