This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [db-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [db-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Mon Oct 20 17:27:54 CEST 2008
It seems rather cumbersome to file a change proposal for each and
every individual document where it basically comes down to a cosmetic
change following international standards and will prevent us from a
lot of discussion and the small risk some of these changes won't get
consensus and we end up with 2 different models.
Apart from this, it seems prudent to wait until
draft-ietf-idr-as-representation-01.txt will become an official
standard. Then it can be properly quoted.
Since it is not defining a protocol, it is more likely to become a
BCP anyway.
jaap
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [db-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]