This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Oct 15 18:27:21 CEST 2008
García Fernández wrote: > I also agree that the policy should include some statements regarding IPv6 > allocation. > > In fact I think that existing LIRs have very well warned about the end of > the world^H^H^H^H^H IPv4 address space available so I think that the > proposal should be more in the lines of: > > 1. New LIRs: Get the minimum allocation IF they already have a IPv6 > allocation OR the ask for an IPv6 allocation in the same request. as we are using power to coerce, i think they should agree to vote for obama. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]