This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-8 discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-8 discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-8 discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Tue Oct 14 17:29:30 CEST 2008
Michael, On Oct 13, 2008, at 4:34 AM, <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com > wrote: > I am assuming that ISPs will sort out the remaining technical > issues and deploy them within the next two to three years so > that they can indeed provide IPv6 network access that allows > communication with 100% of the Internet. Just for the sake of argument, let's go out on a limb and say (for whatever reason), the ISPs do NOT work out the remaining technical issues and deploy IPv6 in a way that will meet their customer requirements before the IPv4 free pool is exhausted. I see the following options for ISPs: a) stop growing, turn away customers (or, more likely, raise prices to drive out the lower paying customers to free up space for new customers) b) buy up any organization they can find that has address space c) go to the black market to obtain new address space at a market- defined price d) accept new customers only if they come with their own address space e) start selling (potentially multi-layer) NAT'd connectivity Do you see any other options? Thanks, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-8 discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-8 discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]