This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] does 2007-08 open the doors to address trading?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] do IP addresses have a financial value?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] does 2007-08 open the doors to address trading?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Thu Oct 9 19:19:59 CEST 2008
Andy, On Oct 9, 2008, at 12:28 AM, Andy Davidson wrote: > Addressing doesn't have latent worth right now because as an LIR > with a justifiable need, I can beg resources from a hostmaster, at > no (or a small marginal - if billing score is implicated) direct cost. What is justifiable to the requester may not be justifiable to RIPE- NCC (or other RIRs). The IPv4 black market exists because of this difference of viewpoint. > I therefore can't trade any of these address resources because > others can do the same. This means that today the addresses have no > value. You are asserting the black market doesn't exist. An interesting approach. Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] do IP addresses have a financial value?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] does 2007-08 open the doors to address trading?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]