This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Oct 9 02:24:52 CEST 2008
hi sander, >> one would think that the goal would be to maximally get ipv4 space >> into play > Unless we can get IPv6 completely deployed before we run out of IPv4 > space, I think this should indeed be our current goal. i think we should start a betting pool. when the last /8s are given to the rirs by iana, X percent of traffic in bits/sec measured at some easy point (say linx, amsix, or de-cix). i take X=6. yes, i am an optimist. and i do not believe that any amount of screaming, twisted policies, threats, ... will change this at all significantly, just as it does not for bcp 38, dns vulnerability patching, ... there are the folk who do things and the folk who don't. transfer is one of the few things we can do in the address policy space which may actually make a difference, albeit not a large one, but still a difference. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]