This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Wed Oct 8 02:56:26 CEST 2008
Michael and all, I concur with Michael here... michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > > as the comment period for the v3 of 2007-08 is nearing its > > end (one week left), please send your comments about it to the list. > > 2007-08 <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-08.html> > is a dishonest policy. It enables buying and selling of IP address > blocks without saying anything about how this relates to the statement > in RIPE-421 (The IPv6 policy) which says: > > It is contrary to the goals of this document > and is not in the interests of the Internet > community as a whole for address space to be > considered freehold property. > > RIPE policy and practice already allows LIRs to return surplus > addresses to RIPE. If an LIR finds itself in a position to have > surplus IPv4 addresses (very unlikely) then why do we need to > change the existing practice? > > I can see only one motivation for this change, and that is to allow > LIRs to sell address space, and I believe that this is contrary > to the interests of the entire IP networking community. > > 2007-08 should be rejected because no consensus has been formed and > we have seen very little discussion of the points outlined by Sander > Steffann > in his email of June 13th. > <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2008/msg0 > 0382.html> > > --Michael Dillon Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]