This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Wed Oct 8 20:44:30 CEST 2008
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Per Heldal wrote: > I'd prefer a firm rejection of any policy designed enable a > marketplace > for integers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canute_the_Great#Ruler_of_the_waves > That should at least discourage some of the worst > speculators and eliminate the financial motive for any organisation to > hang on to blocks they don't need and return them to the common pool. There is no incentive to be more efficient in IPv4 address space in order to return blocks to the common pool now. I'm curious: why do you think will there be incentive in the future? Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]