This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] does 2007-08 open the doors to address trading?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Oct 8 18:14:41 CEST 2008
> Could we see a public statement from ETNO or the majority of > its members that should an IPv4 address market emerge after > RIR exhaustion, that all ETNO members will abstain from > engaging in IP address trading? I don't know why you are asking me that question. I have no formal involvement with ETNO. All I do is read ETNO documents, occasionally post messages about the content of their documents on RIR lists and try to encourage more ETNO members to join in the RIR dialog. As you well know, ETNO members tend to be larger companies, and therefore they have complex, and slow internal processes. I'm not sure that it would be possible to get a company to make the sort of committment that you are asking for. On the other hand, the same complexity and slowness would make it rather difficult for one of those companies to actually sell an IP address block. Anyone who looks at this aspect of the issue will see that huge amounts of the IPv4 address space are tied up in this way and are very unlikely to ever be transferred to another company if it appears that IP addresses have some monetary value. As long as it is a technical issue, it is possible to hand back unused addresses as we recently did with a piece of the 14/8 block. --Michael Dillon P.S. My employer happens to be a member of ETNO but all that means is that I sometimes have an opportunity to comment on ETNO documents before they are published. Other people in the company handle the ETNO relationship which is mostly not about IP addresses at all. My postings to this list are based on my many years of experience in the ISP industry since starting a regional ISP back in 1994.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] does 2007-08 open the doors to address trading?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]