This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Remco van Mook
Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com
Wed Nov 19 15:15:29 CET 2008
Dear Andrei, all, While I appreciate what you're getting at, I'd prefer a more general proposal for 'resources for the NCC'. As any resource allocated to the NCC can be perceived as a conflict between the NCC and ALL of its members (the resources won't be available for them :) I'd suggest that we create a policy that lets the NCC file a request in the ordinary way and then have a few members of the NCC arbiter pool evaluate that request, sitting in the chair of the hostmasters^Wresource analysts. Since the NCC is the only party that can't sign a contract with the NCC, it stands to reason that we have something in place to handle this. Best, Remco van Mook (incidentally one of those arbiters) > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net > [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Andrei > Robachevsky > Sent: woensdag 19 november 2008 14:10 > To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE > meeting network > > Dear Colleagues, > > This is an informal submission of the proposal that was presented at > RIPE 57 in Dubai > (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-57/presentations/Robac > hevsky-IPv6_assignment_for_RIPE_meeting_network.pdf), > as was suggested by the community. > > Your feedback is appreciated as well as your opinion whether a formal > submission should follow. > > Regards, > > Andrei Robachevsky > RIPE NCC > > > IPv6 address space assignment for RIPE Meetings > --------------------------------------- > > A dedicated IPv6 prefix is assigned to the organisation that organises > the RIPE Meetings. The size of this prefix is a /48 and the assignment > will be valid as long as the organisation is responsible for > organising > the RIPE Meetings and the usage of the prefix is limited to > RIPE Meeting > networks. > > The status of this assignment will be 'ASSIGNED MEETING' in the RIPE > Database and must be returned to the RIPE NCC if not in use for RIPE > Meeting networks. > > Rationale: > -------- > a. Arguments supporting the proposal > > RIPE NCC has been organising RIPE Meetings for over a decade > now and it > is still responsible for the setup of the meeting network. > > As IPv6 deployment has became more of a necessity, the RIPE > NCC has been > providing IPv6 network during RIPE Meetings too. Although first couple > of setups were more at an experimental level, currently we > offer this as > a production-grade service to the attendees. The IPv6 space for these > networks so far has been provided by some other organisations > and so the > assignments were in temporary nature. We appreciate the support these > organisations have provided so far. > > Today a permanent IPv6 prefix is a necessity to be able to provide a > stable and high quality service during RIPE Meetings. Having such a > permanent and dedicated prefix, the RIPE Meeting Team of the RIPE NCC > will be able to design and test the RIPE meeting network beforehand, > which will ensure stable operation of the IPv6 network during the RIPE > Meetings. This will also allow the team to have complete control over > the network to effectively address issues related to security, > redundancy and setting efficient routing policies with third parties. > > The proposal is worded in a way that the IPv6 prefix will be > provided to > the RIPE Meeting organiser. This is to ensure that the prefix > will stay > with the meeting organiser for the sole usage in RIPE meetings. This > means if the RIPE NCC ceases being the RIPE Meeting organiser in the > future, the prefix will be returned to the free pool. > > The reason for the size being set to a /48 is about routing reasons. > Because this is the minimum excepted routable assignment size that is > common among all regions, we think a prefix in this size will > guarantee > connectivity during RIPE Meetings. > > > b. Arguments opposing the proposal > > Some may argue that this will cause waste of address space because the > prefix will be only in use effectively during RIPE meeting > > This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]