This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
B C
brettlists at gmail.com
Mon Nov 17 14:59:11 CET 2008
Ondrej, in the light of the comments on my proposal for ENUM anycast assignments discussed in Dubai, I was planning to write a revised policy proposal to go through PDP, I will be taking action on this as soon as the minutes/webcast from Dubai are available. I think it's safe to say we are working towards the same/similar goal and I think it's important that we don't both do the same work. I will have a first draft of my proposal here in the next couple of weeks. Regards Brett Carr Nominet UK On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury at nic.cz> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I would like to post unformal proposal before writing > official policy modification proposal (and/or having > discussion tomorrow on Open Hour). > > We would like to see policy for IPv4 and IPv6 modified > to allow /24 *minimum* for IPv4 and /48 *minimum* to > gTLD/ccTLD. > > First reason behind this is that one PI is not really > enough and it's blocking us to deploy more DNS servers > and make our TLD service more reliable. > > Second reason is that if we deploy more Anycasted DNS > servers we could keep (or drop down) number of NS records > for TLD, so we could manage to keep DNS reply size low > even with DNSSEC. > > And last, but not least, it would be good to keep this > synchronized with other regions (see [1],[2]). Note: > we may also extend the list of requestors to: > Root DNS, ccTLD, gTLD, IANA, RIRs. > Which I think is reasonable list. > > 1. http://www.nro.net/documents/comp-pol.html#2-4-2 > 2. http://www.nro.net/documents/comp-pol.html#3-4-1 > > If there is at least some consensus, I am willing to > write official policy change proposal. > > Ondrej > -- > Ondřej Surý > technický ředitel/Chief Technical Officer > ----------------------------------------- > CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- .cz domain registry > Americká 23,120 00 Praha 2,Czech Republic > mailto:ondrej.sury at nic.cz http://nic.cz/ > sip:ondrej.sury at nic.cz <sip%3Aondrej.sury at nic.cz> tel:+420.222745110 > mob:+420.739013699 fax:+420.222745112 > ----------------------------------------- > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20081117/f98af1a6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]