[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE NCC Board and the PDP Was: 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)

On 27.05 15:24, Nigel Titley wrote:
> ... 
> I'm not entirely sure through what formal channel this feedback should 
> come (if indeed there is a formal channel), but I have taken the step of 
> making sure that future board meetings should include a section on 
> current policies under development so that we can spot them coming.


That is very appropriate. 

My suggestion for the procedureal channel is to strengthen the
operational reviews during the discussion and review phase in the PDP
and making them explicit in the PDP document.  There should be both an
operational and a legal review by the RIPE NCC.  The legal review could
be defined broader than just looking at the impact on the RIPE NCC. 
ARIN's review procedures could be considered as examples for this. 

I proposed this at the WG chairs meeting in Berlin, but I am afraid this
may have been drowned by the concrete matter at hand. 

> Hope this clarifies my previous remarks

It indeed does.  I knew what you meant but I found it important to
prevent any mis-interpretations. 

Daniel