This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Tue Mar 25 02:44:08 CET 2008
On Mar 19, Filiz Yilmaz <filiz at ripe.net> wrote: > PDP Number: 2008-02 > Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR I oppose this proposal on the grounds that it is already easy enough (almost automatic actually) for LIRs to receive an IPv6 allocation. I do not believe that it would remove real-world impediments to IPv6 deployment in a significant-enough number of LIRs to justify the risks associated with automatic one-size-fits-all allocations. The eventuality of a LIR to move to a more expensive billing category as the result of an unsolicited allocation should be enough in itself to consider this proposal unacceptable. -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20080325/d272c739/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]