This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [OT] IPv4 addresses in RIPE database.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [OT] IPv4 addresses in RIPE database.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Questions on IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Gondek
drixter at e-utp.net
Sat Mar 22 09:32:46 CET 2008
Hello, > rule of thumb as heard in ripe-ncc's LIR workshop: > everything larger than 4 IP Adresses should be assigned in ripe-db; dsl > end users e.g. are your own infrastructre - you do not need to assign > this individually, Live example: ADSL user (a company) with assigned a 8/5 static network => /29 subnet. LIR have to/should/can add this subnet as separate inetnum in RIPE DB? -- Marcin Gondek / Drixter e-utp.net NIP: PL1181589645 REGON: 140584662 Tel. +48602159929 Fax. +48222012418 office at e-utp.net http://www.e-utp.net
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [OT] IPv4 addresses in RIPE database.
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Questions on IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]