This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [OT] IPv4 addresses in RIPE database.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [OT] IPv4 addresses in RIPE database.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Gondek
drixter at e-utp.net
Fri Mar 21 19:45:04 CET 2008
Hello All, Which policy, rule or document of RIPE describes that if ISP giving to customer more than one IP address then those addresses have to/should be saved into RIPE database as independent entry of inetnum? Or there is no rule, and ISP doing it because they want to make "clear view" of used IP addresses. Thanks in advance. PS: I tried to find on RIPE website. Question is about IPv4. -- Marcin Gondek / Drixter e-utp.net NIP: PL1181589645 REGON: 140584662 Tel. +48602159929 Fax. +48222012418 <mailto:office at e-utp.net> office at e-utp.net <http://www.e-utp.net> http://www.e-utp.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20080321/a78b586d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [OT] IPv4 addresses in RIPE database.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]