This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Mar 20 17:28:09 CET 2008
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:18:15PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
> So, as far as I can tell, the "one size fits all" idea is an attempt
> to further the IETF anti-NAT jihad, and has nothing to do with
> anyone's operational needs. :-(
Actually, it *does* make an operator's life easier. Just a single button
"give this customer space", without long planning on the specific size that
this specific end customer might need, in 3 years time.
Regarding the actual size of the block, I don't really care - there are
enough bits available. What good are 128 bits if we don't use them?
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 110584
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]