This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Thu Mar 20 14:04:00 CET 2008
michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > Any market for IPv4 addresses will only exist for a short time, and high > prices which would justify this type of sale will exist for an even > shorter time. It is just not that expensive to transition to IPv6. Most > of the cost nowadays, lies in development of a fully transparent > IPv4-IPv6 Internet access service. That work is now being done openly by > many companies, and when the IPv4 shortage starts to be felt, most > companies will be in a position to roll out IPv6 without excessive > costs. > I share your opinions on the likely length of existence for this market, which is why I see no great harm in the proposal and even less likelihood of governments and regulators getting involved. The intention is provide a short period of IPv4 fluidity to ease transition to IPv6. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [BULK] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]