This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Sun Jun 15 11:22:56 CEST 2008
Jay, On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:16:15AM +0100, Jay Daley wrote: > Is that really it? In which case let's call this policy change for > what it really is - it is scrapping the allocation policy in order > to protect the usage policy. It is not giving RIPE NCC any control > over the market. All it does is retain RIPE NCC control over the > use of addresses after they have left the market and go into use. Yes, and this is a good thing. Imagine that I run a network. How do you propose I prove to my peers that I am the one, unique user of a given address prefix without the RIR system (or some other equivalent centralized accounting system) in place? -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]