This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Fri Jun 13 20:57:18 CEST 2008
Jay, On Jun 13, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Jay Daley wrote: > No I don't believe that. Without 2007-08, if no attempt is made at a > stronger reclaim/reuse then slowly my example will appear and yes it > will > be messy. With 2008-08 my example will appear rapidly and it will > be messy. So there is a mess either way. I agree. I guess the major point of difference is that I would like to see the RIRs maintain some level of control as the IPv4 address space reassignment regime evolves. I don't see that happening without something like 2007-08. (I also suspect you're far more optimistic than I regarding timeframes for your scenario, but I've probably been around too many VCs and 'domainers'). Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]