This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Jun 13 14:23:57 CEST 2008
Hi Michael, > We cannot demand everyone participating in the consensus to reveal > their potential to benefit financially from the change, but I think > that it is reasonable to ask the "officials" to put their financial > position on the public record. You can always ask :) I personally don't mind giving information about my position. I am currently not working for an LIR. I have a share in Computel Standby BV, which has two /21s. These are both in use, and because /21 is the minimal allocation size those blocks can't be split up. This means that Computel can't transfer any address space, and my potential personal benefit is 0. Sander Steffann APWG co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]