This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] A comment on 2008-03 & 2007-09
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] A comment on 2008-03 & 2007-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Sun Jun 1 11:59:53 CEST 2008
> I am curious about other situation. > Suppose that IANA allocates the last 2 /8s to the RIR A and > one day later IANA receives a request from the RIR B that is > running out of > IPv4 addresses while the RIR A has (at least) 2 /8s. I don't think that IANA would ever do this because it would be an incredibly stupid thing to do. Since I have never heard IANA being accused of gross incompetence before, I have to believe that when they receive that request from RIR A, they will ask all the other RIRs about how many addresses they need before allocating anything. In fact, I expect IANA to do this well before the last 2 /8 blocks. Then, after consulting all RIRs, I expect IANA to publish their intentions and ask for comments before allocating any blocks. This is just good business practice and I don't think that the RIRs need to write policies which tell IANA to do this. --Michael Dillon
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] A comment on 2008-03 & 2007-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]