This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Tue Jul 15 13:15:28 CEST 2008
> Especially for "legacy" assignments, done by InterNIC to a > company that has been sold and bought 5 times in the meantime... In the case of ARIN, you have to sign a new Registration Services Agreement if the company name changes. I just went through this for resources registered to CompanyName, Inc. where the network assets are now owned by CompanyName Americas, Inc. Same company name, but ARIN requires the Registration Services Agreement to be formally signed by an officer of the new corporate name. I'm beginning to think that it was simple the *WRONG* decision to try and bundle together the issue of registration services contracts for PI assignments going forward, and migrating existing PI holders into a contractual relationship. I believe we have consensus on requiring a contract to be signed for any future assignments/allocations. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]