[address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:54:58AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> as one of those who think arin's approach to this is insulting and
> legally unjustified, i would be quite cheered by a more even-handed and
> less self-righteous example being set by ripe.

So what do you propose how to tackle this?  

(As in "this" being "establish stronger ties to the existing resource 
holders", to figure out where the resources are today, and possibly 
reclaim those that have been truly lost).

I assume that you don't worry about requiring the contracts for *new*
end-user assignments, but only worry about retroactively applying those?

(I want to point out that the audience at the last RIPE meeting in 
Amsterdam explicitely asked Nick Hilliard to change 2007-01 v1 to 
include existing assignments, which v1 did *not* do.  So this is how
we arrived here...)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  110584

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279