This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Sat Jul 12 19:15:33 CEST 2008
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 09:54 -0700, David Conrad wrote: > On Jul 12, 2008, at 1:59 AM, Per Heldal wrote: > > Nothing prevents the RIR-community from > > changing the rules to reclaim un-announced space *if* there is > > consensus > > in support for such a move. > > I'm curious: un-announced to whom? That's a matter of definition. A definition that would have to be included in such a policy. For the RIPE region one could for example argue that a block that isn't visible to RIS in a given set of locations is not used publicly. //per
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]