This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised2007-01...
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Fri Jul 11 12:38:00 CEST 2008
Peter and all, Yep this is and will be a problem. So than they need to apply for additional private space again and hope it hasn't been put in other routing tables, or seek a different solution. FWIW, I can acquire plenty of IPv8 private space that I am very sure isn't in anyones public routing tables. Of course the price is VERY reasonable as well! >:) Routes great on any VPN as well... And amazingly enough those businesses won't have any ICANN, ASO, Ripe, ARIN, APNIC, of AFNIC worries to boot. >:) Additionally, encaptulates IPv4 public IP's and IPv6 IP's seamlessly. >:) With the passing of FISA, I'm getting quite a few new discrete inquiries... So all is not lost, just changing... Ya just can't stop progress, slow it down maybe, but never stop it... Peter Galbavy wrote: > Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Shane Kerr: > > > > > >> Fortunately there are no secrets in the routing table! So, it is easy > >> to see if any given space is being routed or not. > >> > >> The only time there is a problem is if revoked space is still being > >> routed by someone. > >> > > > > Some address space owners rely the uniqueness property. This applies to > > 3/8 and 9/8, for example, but I'm sure that it happens on a smaller > > scale, too. > > > > > > And, more importantly, PI space that is not publicly routed but must be > unique. On behalf of clients in the past I have applied for and had > assigned PI space for intra-organisational and/or VPN space. These > large, sometimes multinational, companies have public connectivity and > use private address space internally and where they need a VPN or secure > connection between themselves they do not want that in the public > routing tables but cannot use private space. > > If this space is reclaimed on the simplistic basis of "it wasn't in the > public routing table yesterday (or ever)" then reassigned, suddenly the > original assignee finds their private and confidetial traffic might > start leaking out one of their public connections. Great. > > Peter Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]