This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Fri Jul 11 16:32:02 CEST 2008
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:11:41PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > Remember, the only thing that a PI address space holder needs to > > do is sign a contract with the RIPE NCC saying "I am the holder of > > this PI space", so it should not cause any fuss. > > perhaps you have not looked at arin's legacy holder agreement. > check out section nine, in particular. essentially it says you give > up the rights. No thanks, I don't really have the inclination to waste my time reading legalese. ARIN is way too uptight about legalities, but I guess that reflects the culture of the region. I think the RIPE region is a bit more practical, and we can worry about making the system work better instead of who has what rights and who gets to sue who. And anyway, the current RIPE proposal (2007-01) does not cover legacy space, so I will happily ignore the problem for now. ;) -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]