This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Fri Jul 11 15:08:56 CEST 2008
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 04:58:41PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > What would you propose the RIPE NCC do with revoked address space > > assignments? Should they just keep them in a "sin bin" or should > > they allocate or assign the address space to other network > > operators? > > sell them at a price high enough to pay for some extremely large > lawyer bills. Why would there be large lawyer bills? Wouldn't it be much, MUCH cheaper to simply sign a contract with the RIPE NCC saying "I am the assignee of this space" rather than spend money on laywers? -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]