This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
david.conrad at icann.org
Wed Jan 16 18:57:40 CET 2008
An "interesting" (in sort of the way the Ebola virus is "interesting") problem that is going to become much more common as we start reallocating previously allocated or otherwise flagged blocks. Leo Vegoda has done a couple of presentations on this. Just imagine the fun folks who are going to get prefixes out of 1.0.0.0/8 are going to have. Options I can think of: 1) Get everybody to transition to IPv6 (um, yeah). 2) Get all the folks who are running RBLs/DUNs to update their lists when address status changes (slightly more realistic than (1)). 3) Get everybody to use reputation services like http://www.karmasphere.com/, et al. (no, I'm not affiliated with them) 4) Get RPKI deployed to reduce the need for black list services (um, yeah.) 5) Get the folks who win the draw on prefixes to go around to every black list service themselves (as they discover them) and convince the operator of that list (somehow) to remove them (the default). No good answers I'm aware of... Regards, -drc On 1/16/08 9:28 AM, "Max Tulyev" <president at ukraine.su> wrote: > Hello All, > > I just got an assignment for my client (large PI block). But this block > is listed in all DNS RBLs and DUN lists, as it was in use till Oct'07 as > dynamic DHCP pool of other big ISP. > > So my client says they can't use this network, because mail service is > blocked. > > RIPE rejected my request to change this network to another one: "As we > do understand how unfortunate this is for **********, there is nothing > we can do about prefixes that appear on so called black lists." > > How can I solve this?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]