[address-policy-wg] New correct proposal (Was: 2008-01/2008-02)

On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:50:29PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
> [..]
> >Here is my wish list for IPv6 PI:
> >
> >- No PI assignments via LIRs. LIRs only manage PA IPv6.
> >- special membership in RIPE with an annual fee for PI holders
> >- contract signed between RIPE and PI holders that covers fee
> >  payments, and revocation/return of address blocks
> >- special known superblock from which all PI allocations are made
> >  so that people can manage their filters
> >- /48 minimum PI allocation but larger aggregate is also possible
> >- contact every IPv4 PI holder by email and inform them of the 
> >  new rules for IPv6 PI allocations
> >
> >In my opinion that should be followed by another policy change
> >which requires RIPE membership, annual fee payment and a signed
> >contract for any future ASN assignments or IPv4 PI address blocks.
> 
> Now *THAT* is a solid policy proposal that I would be willing to support.

I agree completely.

--
Shane