[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

Hello,

Maybe it is an option to use the same system as used by PI space on IPv4.
Also more than a /48 should be possible with PI space on IPv6 (for example a
/44).

I'm not a LIR, but I will require to have PI space on IPv6 before I start
using it (I need the option to move IPs from network 1 to network 2 and the
option to have multiple uplink providers).

Please remember: the easier it is to use and the easier it is to get IPv6 
space the faster it will be used.

With kind regards, Met vriendelijke groet,

Mark Scholten
Stream Service
Web: http://www.streamservice.nl/
E-mail: mark at streamservice.nl
NOC: http://www.mynoc.eu/
NOC e-mail: noc at streamservice.nl
Tel.: +31 (0)642 40 86 02
KVK: 08141074
BTW: NL104278274B01
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marcin Gondek" <drixter at e-utp.net>
To: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:29 PM
Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6
PI to Every Inetnum Holder)


Hello,

So maybe we can make this way:
There is some membership free for PI user and then some yearly payment to
keep it working.
Please understand, not anyone have to be LIR

> First of all, I don't think the majority is afraid of the idea of PI
> itself (the old "carriers want to constrain their customers" myth), the
> majority is afraid of running it like it is currently done for IPv4 in
> the RIPE region. I'm talking about PI space that is visible in the DFZ
> here of course, unannounced PI space should mostly be covered by ULA.
 [...]
> but I don't think there is any legal loophole where you could apply it
> to the already assigned space.
>
> Bernhard

So maybe we can make this way:
Make some membership fee for PI user and then some yearly payment to keep it
working.
For example:
- 500E setup fee
- 100E for ASN request for this PI
Plus some kind monitoring, if PI addresses in request are requested for
public use, not internal then:
- have to be visible by RIPE router more than 75% time in year from date of
assignment + 1 month.
- 100E yearly maintenance
If there availability time is smaller than 75%, again there is a setup fee
or addresses backing to RIPE. Also ASN can be taken back to the RIPE.
If PI addresses are requested for internal usage:
- 200E yearly maintenance

Every PI-member can have only one /48 prefix if we need more, then have to
be a LIR, have to have a legal business in RIPE region and etc.

Then, RIPE make a special /32 where those /48 are stored (for easy
filtering).

Please understand, not everyone have to be LIR because they don't need it to
be, but they need PI address because they have >1 upstreams. It's very
popular here in Poland. Now I hearing for people: "We don't implement IPv6
because there is no PI procedure. We don't want to be a LIR."

I'm not a LIR, I just wondering, maybe someone will agree with me for this
PI idea.


Regards,

-- 
Marcin Gondek / Drixter
e-utp.net
NIP: PL1181589645
REGON: 140584662
Tel. +48602159929
Fax. +48222012418
office at e-utp.net
http://www.e-utp.net